Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The B-Team (professional wrestling) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The B-Team (professional wrestling)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has already been deleted once due to lack of notability and nothing has changed since. I moved the page to draft but rather than working on it there and attempting to build a case for notability, the user instead recreated the page again. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 21:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 21:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning keep and improve. I had actually thought about writing an article on the same tag team, based on the Bleacher Report article which I have now added describing their tag-team championship as proof that the WWE doesn't take that belt. Their championship may be scripted, but it positions them with notability within the franchise. BD2412 T 23:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- But WP:PW/RS has very limited reliability of Bleacher Report, so not so sure that would help toward notability. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 19:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is of limited use, but only pre-2013 articles are prohibited. BD2412 T 19:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Note: There is also Draft:The B-Team. BD2412 T 20:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yes, for "Can be used for minor claims such as interviews or match results." Stating what their purpose is and the type of tag team they are is outside of that scope. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 14:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - The scope is by its own terms nonexclusive – "minor claims such as"; the fact that a promotion serves as comic relief is a similarly minor claim. BD2412 T 18:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Mostly in-universe discussion of fictive characters without any critical commentary or indication of real-world significance. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 02:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.